Zen is a philosophy of will power. There are no special doctrines or
There is no deity to depend on or to assure one's conscience.
You are saddled with the responsibility for yourself.
Zen is based on a spirit of self-reliance. You must learn to depend on
yourself. But this is no simple statement.
There is no result in Zen practice. that is not the point. It is the
effort you make to improve yourself that is measured.
Zen is a practical discipline. In Zen enlightenment can be achieved in this
lifetime. Zen wants you to act now, to experience this moment right now,
The effect of such action is to give you the power to cope.
That is important in today's world. Furthermore, the resiliency that is
developed in one's practice allows for appropriate responses. Coping
appropriately is a key concept.
ZENS VIEW POINT
Zen is a social philosophy as well.A goal of Zen is to realize your potenci
al as a human being. The "self" is understood not only as an individual,
but as a member of the community of individuals (society).
Zen stresses self-perfection, and in so practicing, one tends to be more
aware of one's place in the world, not in the sense of "better" but more
in the sense of "sufficient."
In a famous Zen story, Nan-in, a Zen master, was visited by a university
professor who wished to know all about Zen.
Nan-in served the professor some tea. He poured the cup full, and then continued to pour.
The professor watched the overflow until he could no longer
restrain himself. "Stop it! No more will go in!".
"Like this cup", said the master, "you are full of your own ideas and
How can I show you Zen unless you first empty your cup?".
It is understood by the Zen mind that senses cannot grasp reality from one
viewpoint. For example, the Rock garden at RYOANJI, a Zen temple near Kyoto
appears a few rocks and some sand.
The garden begins to make sense when you realize that from your vantagepoint
you cannot quite see all the rocks...You might also notice that you are
picking out only the rocks to look at.
Is not all that sands just as important?
What if it was all rocks? Would
you be trying as hard to see all the rocks?
When the light goes on, one says, "The light is on." But are you aware of
the absence or darkness? Have you considered all side of the situation, in
your obserevation of it?
A Zen Master, quoted "If you want to see, see
right at once. When you begin to think, you miss the point."
In Zen first comes the technique. practiced so many times that it is
forgotten. Then you begin to use it. It is when you do not think about it
anymore, that you do it well. Zen is no more than that.
The professional dancer who makes it look easy has trained constantly, and
endured great pain.
The tennis pro who flies around the court, making impossible shots,
does so not because of any superhuman qualities, but because
he has practiced and practiced,as the dancer has,until the movements are internalized.
There is no longer any consciencious direction in the movement.
When you marvel at the way someone whips up a dinner for ten on short
notice, or the way someone makes an impronpt speech, you are marveling at
the same thing, the appproch, the confidence, the naturalness of the
behavior. There was no time to prepare, no time to think, no time to
resitate. There you are, Z E N.
A Zen story illustrates this: Two monks were travelling in the rain, the
mud sloshing under their feet.
As they passed a river crossing, they saw
a beatiful woman, finely dressed, unable to cross because of the mud.
Without a word, the older monk simply picked up the woman and carried her
to the other side. The younger monk, seemingly agitated for the rest of
the journey, could not contain himself once they reached their destination.
He exploded at the older monk.
"How could you, a monk, even consider
holding a woman in your arms, much less a young and beatiful one.It is
against our teachings. It is dangerous."
"I put her down at the roadside," said the older monk.
"Are you still carrying her?"
This story, brings onto focus a resolution of the seeming contradiction
between a master of Zen and a master of war being one and the same person.
Our friend the old monk picked the woman up and put her down. That's all.
No meditation by the intellect. He just did it. His mind, other than to
work his muscles, was not a part of the experience. Yet the rules of his
order prohibited his behavious. Did he do the right thing? Was it appropriate?
Morality is judged by intention, that is, subjective intention. It is clear
that to take a life is inmoral. But in the context of a volcano erupting
and killing hundreads of people and destroing livestock and so on, it is
hardly appropriate to judge this as inmoral. Why? Because we do not think
of the volcano as intending to do the damage.
On the grander scale, it is not appropiate to make any moral judgement of
any act of nature for the same reason.To question wheather any act of nature
is appropiate or "right" is equally inapropiate.
Nature (its manifestation)
just happen. It just does. The old monk just did it.
And so we come to a resolution of the problem. Our master of Zen acts with
his Zen mind when he lifts his sword. When he strikes, he is doing only
what his body knows how to do. He see it, does it, and drops it. No morality
involved. No intention. It is not act of cutting that is inmoral. A kitchen
knife can cut apples or can be used for more sinister thing. It depends
on the intention of the user.
This is the source of the often misunderstood concept of the Martial Arts.
The Martial Arts have been described as "self-defense", and are thought of
in term of peace, benevolence, humanity, restraint. But the question arises
as to how one can style these activities as "self-defense" when, in fact
, the techniques are mostly offensive.
There is a difference between one who provokes a fight, and the one who is
Zen trainded Martial Artist truly acts only in response to aggression. He
does not seek it out. When made, his response are non-resistant and
non-violent. He is a man of peace. When he is pushed, he does not push back
. He lets whatever it is, go right past him. His response is purely
defensive. It is also DESICIVE.
The Zen taught me that a person is free to do whatsover, that are LEGAL, DEMOCRATIC & SCIENTIFIC.
That We should not judge a person based on morality, but
whether his/her actions are Legally, Democraticaly and Scientificaly sound right.